JavaScript is a Ghost

Posted on | Last Updated on by Paul Kinchla Reading Time: 3 minutes
ghost illustration
Table of Contents

I was talking recently with a fellow developer and the topic of progressive enhancement came up. I asked what her ideas on the topic were and we discussed old browser support, IE and old IE. This is a common conversation I have quite frequently. We frequently associate progressive enhancement with the old—old developers, old browsers, old ideas. What a drag.

The Haunting fragment anchor

For me progressive enhancement is about the absence and presence of features. That is what excites me most about making websites—planning for the unknown.

In my daily work the feature I plan around the most is JavaScript. The following allows me to plan for the unknown and deliver an effective experience in JavaScript’s absence:

document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0].className+=' js';

This will test if JavaScript is available and if passed adds the class of .js to the body element. A common example of where this is applicable would be a navigation menu that’s controlled with JavaScript.

<nav class="navigation">
  <button class="menu">Menu</button>
  <ul class="navigation-items">

A common way to add the functionality we need for the menu would be to set the navigation items to display:none or visibility:none by default and then toggle the display or visibility when the .menu button is pressed. We run into problems though if for any reason JavaScript fails. The .navigation-items will become inaccessible. This is where the js class helps.

   /*default styling*/
  .navigations-items {

  /*close state with JavaScript present*/
  .js .navigation-items {

  /*open state with Javascript present*/
  .js {
    max-height:the height we would like our menu to be;

Without JavaScript the navigation items get styling and work as intended but if JavaScript becomes active the navigation items become hidden ready to be activated by the menu button. The default styling for the navigation items is written as if JavaScript is an apparition. A Feature that may or may not appear depending on any number of different factors.

So what happens to the menu button when JavaScript is not available. A button that doesn’t do anything isn’t very helpful. A good way to solve this problem would be to add the button to the document with JavaScript.

var addGhost = function() {
  // create a button
  var ghostButton = document.createElement('button');
  // create a textnode
  var buttonText = document.createTextNode('Menu');

  // add the textnode to the button
  // set a class for the button

  // vars for targeting our menu within the DOM
  var navItems = document.querySelector('.navigation-items');
  var nav = document.querySelector('.navigation');

  // insert our button right before the navigation-items
  nav.insertBefore(ghostButton, navItems);

With this approach the menu button is conjured only if JavaScript appears.

Treating JavaScript like an anomaly I am able to make websites that are more fault tolerant. To me JavaScript is a ghost. Even in it’s absence it still makes it’s presence felt but remains invisible.

Old is New fragment anchor

Some folks believe progressive enhancement had it’s time but is no longer relevant. To this I would say than let’s look to the future. For example:

<input type=tel>

The input type of telephone is a native feature of HTML designed to be future friendly yet fault tolerant. If the feature is supported it works as intended. If not it works like a input type of text.

The same goes for some of the features in the new Service Worker API. Features like client side caching and working offline will only work in browsers that support these features and silently fail in browsers that don’t.

In many instances my life is made easier by approaching my work with a progressive enhancement mindset because thats how many native features in HTML are designed. To work when supported and remain invisible when not.

6 thoughts on “JavaScript is a Ghost

  1. Karol says:

    Interesting read, thanks!

    1. Paul Kinchla says:

      I’m glad you enjoyed it.

  2. Rowan says:

    Excellent article Paul – explaining the concept concisely in terms that are easy to understand and relate to.

    1. Paul Kinchla says:

      Thanks for the kind words Rowan.

  3. Horst says:

    Very helpful. Many thanks.

Comments are closed.
Back to Table of Contents